Role of engineering design in enhancing ABET outcomes of engg programs at Taif University
Al-Badrawy A. Abo Al-Nasr
Engineering Design is an introductory course in the curriculumof all engineering disciplines in many of engineering programs worldwide. The objective of this course is to enhance students’ soft skills through understanding of the learning materials and to motivate students to improve self-learning skills.ProgramOutcomes (POs) are strong indicators for their ability to understand curriculum content materials at both levels;Course and Program. Active Learning Approaches (ALAs) are used as a learning culture for this course.Systematic assessment of student achievement in engineering design is an important part of program curriculum and vital to accreditation of engineering programs. Direct and indirect measures assess and evaluate the level of outcomes attainment throughout the course of the educational process. These relate to the skills, knowledge, and behaviors that students acquire through their progress in the program.One of the main vehicles of this study is survey that is conducted to students regarding the level of their satisfaction in achieving Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs). Analysis of the survey results along with the students’ grades will be employed as a basis for continuous improvement in teaching and learning practices in engineering programs at Taif University.The indications are that the students enjoy the course and they have become more positive to the gained skills and realize their importance. Addition results and discussionsof the role played by engineering design in enhancing soft skills, in the engineering programs, will be presented
engineering design; active learning; soft skill; program outcomes;ABET
ABET, “Engineering Criteria, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology”, Baltimore, MD, 2003, www.abet.org.
“ABET Self Study Report of the Mechanical Engineering Program”, College of Engineering, Taif University, KSA, June 2015.
S. Alyahyaand A.A. Abo El-Nasr,“Outcomes based assessment of the engineering programs at Qassim University for ABET Accreditation”, Inter. Conf. on Interactive Mobile and Computer Aided Learning (IMCL), November 2012, Publisher: IEEE.
C. A. Palomba and T.W. Banta,“Assessment essentials: planning, implementing”, and improving assessment in higher education, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Pub., 1999.
G. Backlund, and J. Sjunnesson, “Training Young Engineers to See”, AI & society, 27(4), 2012, pp. 509-515
R.M. Felder and R.Brent,“Active Learning: An Introduction”, ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), August 2009.
D.C. Davis, Gentili, K.L., Trevisan, and Calkins, D.E., “Engineering Design Assessment Processes and Scoring Scales for Program Improvement and Accountability”, J. Eng. Edu.” April, 2002, pp. 211-221
G. Pahland W. Beitz, “Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach”, 2nd Ed., 2013, Springer
E. Lumsdaine,M. Lumsdaine, and J.W. Shelnutt,“Creative Problem Solving in Engineering Design”, McGraw-Hill Custom Publishing, 1999
R.W. Crain, , D.C. Davis, D.E. Calkins, and K. Gentili,“Establishing Engineering Design Competencies for Freshman/Sophomore Students”, Proc. Annual Meeting of the American Society for Eng. Education, Anaheim, CA, June 25-28, 1995.
S. Freeman, Active Teaching, “Active Learning: Infusing the Design Process in A First-Year Course”, American Society for Engineering Education, 2006.
J. Lalley and R. Miller, “The Learning Pyramid: Does It Point Teachers in the Right Direction?”, Education, 128 (1), 2007, pp. 64- 79
“Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs, Engineering Accreditation Commission, Effective for Reviews During 2015- 2016”, Accreditation Cycle.
AACSB Inter. Accreditation Quality Committee, “AACSB Assurance of Learning Standards: An Interpretation”, 20 Nov. 2007 – Revised 3 May 2013,
A. Berglund and F. Heintz,“Integrating Soft Skills into Engineering Education for Increased Student Throughput and More Professional Engineers”, LTHs 8:e Pedagogiska Inspirations konferens, Dec. 17, 2014.